Incorporating parental values in complex paediatric and perinatal decisions.

Incorporating parental values in complex medical decisions for young children is important but challenging. In this Review, we explore what it means to incorporate parental values in complex paediatric and perinatal decisions. We provide a narrative overview of the paediatric, ethics, and medical decision-making literature, focusing on value-based and ethically complex decisions for children who are too young to express their own preferences. We explain key concepts and definitions, discuss paediatric-specific features, reflect on challenges in learning and expressing values for both parents and health-care providers, and provide recommendations for clinical practice. Decisional values are informed by global and external values and could relate to the child, the parents, and the whole family. These values should inform preferences and assure value-congruent choices. Additionally, parents might hold various meta values on the process of decision making itself. Complex decisions for young children are emotionally taxing, ethically difficult, and often surrounded by uncertainty. These contextual factors make it more likely that values and preferences are initially absent or unstable and need to be constructed or stabilised. Health-care professionals and parents should work together to construct and clarify values and incorporate them into personalised decisions for the child. An open communication style, with unbiased and tailored information in a supportive environment, is helpful. Dedicated training in communication and shared decision making could help to improve the incorporation of parental values in complex decisions for young children.

Perspectives of extremely prematurely born adults on what to consider in prenatal decision-making: a qualitative focus group study.

OBJECTIVE: A shared decision-making (SDM) approach is recommended for prenatal decisions at the limit of viability, with a guiding role for parental values. People born extremely premature experience the consequences of the decision made, but information about their perspectives on prenatal decisions is lacking. Therefore, this study aims to describe their perspectives on what is important in decision-making at the limit of viability. DESIGN: Semi-structured focus group discussions were conducted, recorded and transcribed verbatim. The data were independently analysed by two researchers in Atlas.ti. RESULTS: Four focus groups were conducted in the Netherlands, with five to six participants each, born between 240/7 and 300/7 weeks gestation in the period between 1965 and 2002. Considering their personal life experiences and how their extremely premature birth affected their families, the participants reflected on decision-making at the limit of viability. Various considerations were discussed and summarised into the following themes: anticipated parental regret, the wish to look at the baby directly after birth, to give the infant a chance at survival, quality of life, long-term outcomes for the infant and the family, and religious or spiritual considerations. CONCLUSIONS: Insights into the perspectives of adults born extremely premature deepened our understanding of values considered in decision-making at the limit of viability. Results point out the need for a more individualised prediction of the prognosis and more extensive information on the lifelong impact of an extremely premature birth on both the infant and the family. This could help future parents and healthcare professionals in value-laden decision-making.

Opportunities and Challenges of Prognostic Models for Extremely Preterm Infants.

Predicting the short- and long-term outcomes of extremely preterm infants remains a challenge. Multivariable prognostic models might be valuable tools for clinicians, parents, and policymakers for providing accurate outcome estimates. In this perspective, we discuss the opportunities and challenges of using prognostic models in extremely preterm infants at population and individual levels. At a population level, these models could support the development of guidelines for decisions about treatment limits and may support policy processes such as benchmarking and resource allocation. At an individual level, these models may enhance prenatal counselling conversations by considering multiple variables and improving transparency about expected outcomes. Furthermore, they may improve consistency in projections shared with parents. For the development of prognostic models, we discuss important considerations such as predictor and outcome measure selection, clinical impact assessment, and generalizability. Lastly, future recommendations for developing and using prognostic models are suggested. Importantly, the purpose of a prognostic model should be clearly defined, and integrating these models into prenatal counselling requires thoughtful consideration.

Exploring professionals' views regarding prenatal counselling in congenital diaphragmatic hernia.

OBJECTIVES: Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a congenital malformation in which the diaphragm and lungs are underdeveloped, leading to cardiorespiratory and other problems. This study aimed to explore professionals' views regarding prenatal counselling in CDH. METHODS: A qualitative study was performed among healthcare professionals involved in the care of CDH patients in Radboud university medical center Amalia Children's Hospital. Semi-structured interviews were conducted until saturation was achieved. Transcripts were qualitatively analysed to gain insight into professionals' views regarding counselling. RESULTS: Eighteen professionals with various backgrounds were included. The professionals agreed that the first counselling session should be soon after diagnosis and additional sessions should be offered. Concerning counselling content, participants considered explanation of the diagnosis, prognosis, short- and long-term consequences, treatment options and practical aspects important. As for decision-making about possible termination of pregnancy, all professionals emphasised the importance of the parental role, but the preferred parental involvement varied. Regarding practical aspects, preferred counsellors were a neonatologist, obstetrician, paediatric surgeon and/or medical social worker. Participants emphasised that the counselling should be adjusted to parents' needs. CONCLUSIONS: This study gained insight into professionals' views regarding the timeline, content, decision-making process, and practical aspects of prenatal counselling in CDH.

A scoping review of parental values during prenatal decisions about treatment options after extremely premature birth.

AIM: To describe what is known in the literature about parental perspectives in making prenatal decisions regarding treatment after birth at the limit of viability, as a better understanding of parental values can help professionals support parents as they decide. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched to identify relevant literature from 1 January 2010 to 22 April 2022 on parental decision making. Data were extracted from selected studies and organised into themes. The final themes were formed through collaboration with the parents of a premature infant born at 24 weeks. RESULTS: Of the 15,159 papers examined, 17 were included. Parental perspectives were described in terms of long-term outcomes for the infant, survival, protection against the burden of neonatal treatment, long-term impact on the family, religion and spiritual beliefs, to do everything possible, hope, sense of responsibility, wanting the best, doing what is right, giving a chance and the influence of experience. CONCLUSION: The extracted parental perspectives show the complexity of these decisions. Some perspectives were clear, but others were multi-interpretable. Increasing the understanding of common parental perspectives can help improve shared prenatal decisions and lead to further improvement and personalisation of the process.

Neonatal Long-Chain 3-Ketoacyl-CoA Thiolase deficiency: Clinical-biochemical phenotype, sodium-D,L-3-hydroxybutyrate treatment experience and cardiac evaluation using speckle echocardiography.

Isolated long-chain 3-keto-acyl CoA thiolase (LCKAT) deficiency is a rare long-chain fatty acid oxidation disorder caused by mutations in HADHB. LCKAT is part of a multi-enzyme complex called the mitochondrial trifunctional protein (MTP) which catalyzes the last three steps in the long-chain fatty acid oxidation. Until now, only three cases of isolated LCKAT deficiency have been described. All patients developed a severe cardiomyopathy and died before the age of 7 weeks. Here, we describe a newborn with isolated LCKAT deficiency, presenting with neonatal-onset cardiomyopathy, rhabdomyolysis, hypoglycemia and lactic acidosis. Bi-allelic 185G > A (p.Arg62His) and c1292T > C (p.Phe431Ser) mutations were found in HADHB. Enzymatic analysis in both lymphocytes and cultured fibroblasts revealed LCKAT deficiency with a normal long-chain 3-hydroxyacyl-CoA dehydrogenase (LCHAD, also part of MTP) enzyme activity. Clinically, the patient showed recurrent cardiomyopathy, which was monitored by speckle tracking echocardiography. Subsequent treatment with special low-fat formula, low in long chain triglycerides (LCT) and supplemented with medium chain triglycerides (MCT) and ketone body therapy in (sodium-D,L-3-hydroxybutyrate) was well tolerated and resulted in improved carnitine profiles and cardiac function. Resveratrol, a natural polyphenol that has been shown to increase fatty acid oxidation, was also considered as a potential treatment option but showed no in vitro benefits in the patient's fibroblasts. Even though our patient deceased at the age of 13 months, early diagnosis and prompt initiation of dietary management with addition of sodium-D,L-3-hydroxybutyrate may have contributed to improved cardiac function and a much longer survival when compared to the previously reported cases of isolated LCKAT-deficiency.

What hinders and helps in the end-of-life decision-making process for children: Parents' and physicians' views.

AIM: To investigate the main factors which facilitate or hinder end-of-life decision-making (EoLDM) in neonates and children. METHODS: A qualitative inductive, thematic analysis was performed of interviews with a total of 73 parents and 71 physicians. The end-of-life decisions mainly concern decisions to withhold or withdraw life-sustaining treatment. RESULTS: The importance of taking sufficient time and exchanging clear, neutral and relevant information was main facilitators expressed by both parents and physicians. Lack of time, uncertain information and changing doctors were seen as important barriers by both parties. Most facilitators and barriers could be seen as two sides of the same coin, but not always. For example, some parents and physicians considered the fact that parents hold strong opinions as a barrier while others considered this a facilitator. Furthermore, parents and physicians showed differences. Parents especially underlined the importance of physician-related facilitators, such as a personalised approach, empathy and trust. On the contrary, physicians underlined the importance of the child's visible deterioration and parents' awareness of the seriousness of their child's condition and prognosis as facilitators of EoLDM. CONCLUSIONS: This study gained insight into what parents and physicians experience as the main barriers and facilitators in EoLDM for neonates and children.

Digital decision aid for prenatal counseling in imminent extreme premature labor: development and pilot testing.

BACKGROUND: In case of extreme premature delivery at 24 weeks of gestation, both early intensive care and palliative comfort care for the neonate are considered treatment options. Prenatal counseling, preferably using shared decision making, is needed to agree on the treatment option in case labor progresses. This article described the development of a digital decision aid (DA) to support pregnant women, partners and clinicians in prenatal counseling for imminent extreme premature labor. METHODS: This DA is developed following the International Patient Decision Aid Standards. The Dutch treatment guideline and the Dutch recommendations for prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity were used as basis. Development of the first prototype was done by expert clinicians and patients, further improvements were done after alpha testing with involved clinicians, patients and other experts (n = 12), and beta testing with non-involved clinicians and patients (n = 15). RESULTS: The final version includes information, probabilities and figures depending on users' preferences. Furthermore, it elicits patient values and provides guidance to aid parents and professionals in making a decision for either early intensive care or palliative comfort care in threatening extreme premature delivery. CONCLUSION: A decision aid was developed to support prenatal counseling regarding the decision on early intensive care versus palliative comfort care in case of extreme premature delivery at 24 weeks gestation. It was well accepted by parents and healthcare professionals. Our multimedia, digital DA is openly available online to support prenatal counseling and personalized, shared decision-making in imminent extreme premature labor.

Dutch guidelines on care for extremely premature infants: Navigating between personalisation and standardization.

OBJECTIVE: There is no international consensus on what type of guideline is preferred for care at the limit of viability. We aimed to conceptualize what type of guideline is preferred by Dutch healthcare professionals: 1) none; 2) gestational-age-based; 3) gestational-age-based-plus; or 4) prognosis-based via a survey instrument. Additional questions were asked to explore the grey zone and attitudes towards treatment variation. FINDING: 769 surveys were received. Most of the respondents (72.8%) preferred a gestational-age-based-plus guideline. Around 50% preferred 24+0/7 weeks gestational age as the lower limit of the grey zone, whereas 26+0/7 weeks was the most preferred upper limit. Professionals considered treatment variation acceptable when it is based upon parental values, but unacceptable when it is based upon the hospital's policy or the physician's opinion. CONCLUSION: In contrast to the current Dutch guideline, our results suggest that there is a preference to take into account individual factors besides gestational age.

Prenatal counseling for extreme prematurity at the limit of viability: A scoping review.

OBJECTIVES: To explore, based on the existing body of literature, main characteristics of prenatal counseling for parents at risk for extreme preterm birth. METHODS: A scoping review was conducted searching Embase, Medline, Web of Science, Cochrane, CINAHL, and Google Scholar. RESULTS: 46 articles were included. 27 of them were published between 2017 and 2021. More than half of them were conducted in the United States of America. Many different study designs were represented. The following characteristics were identified: personalization, parent-physician relationships, shared decision-making, physician bias, emotions, anxiety, psychosocial factors, parental values, religion, spirituality, hope, quality of life, and uncertainty. CONCLUSIONS: Parental values are mentioned in 37 of the included articles. Besides this, uncertainty, shared decision-making, and emotions are most frequently mentioned in the literature. However, reflecting on the interrelation between all characteristics leads us to conclude that personalization is the most notable trend in prenatal counseling practices. More and more, it is valued to adjust the counseling to the parent(s). PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This scoping review emphasizes again the complexity of prenatal counseling at the limit of viability. It offers an exploration of how it is currently approached, and reflects on how future research can contribute to optimizing it.

Development of Nationwide Recommendations to Support Prenatal Counseling in Extreme Prematurity.

OBJECTIVES: To develop a nationwide, evidence-based framework to support prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity, focusing on organization, decision-making, content, and style aspects. METHODS: A nationwide multicenter RAND-modified Delphi method study was performed between November 2016 and December 2017 in the Netherlands. Firstly, recommendations were extracted from literature and previous studies. Secondly, an expert panel (n = 21) with experienced parents, obstetricians, and neonatologists rated the recommendations on importance for inclusion in the framework. Thirdly, ratings were discussed in a consensus meeting. The final set of recommendations was approved and transformed into a framework. RESULTS: A total of 101 recommendations on organization, decision-making, content, and style were included in the framework, including tools to support personalization. The most important recommendations regarding organization were to have both parents involved in the counseling with both the neonatologist and obstetrician. The shared decision-making model was recommended for deciding between active support and comfort care. Main recommendations regarding content of conversation were explanation of treatment options, information on survival, risk of permanent consequences, impossibility to predict an individual course, possibility for multiple future decision moments, and a discussion on parental values and standards. It was considered important to avoid jargon, check understanding, and provide a summary. The expert panel, patient organization, and national professional associations (gynecology and pediatrics) approved the framework. CONCLUSIONS: A nationwide, evidence-based framework for prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity was developed. It contains recommendations and tools for personalization in the domains of organization, decision-making, content, and style of prenatal counseling.

Prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity - Insight into preferences from experienced parents.

OBJECTIVE: In-depth analysis of parental preferences in prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity. METHODS: A nationwide qualitative interview study among experienced parents of extremely premature babies born at 24+0/7 - 24+6/7 weeks of gestation. Semi-structured interviews were held until saturation, transcribed and qualitatively analyzed to search for parental counseling preferences. RESULTS: Thirteen parents were included, most parents decided on active care. Organisation: Parents wanted counseling as soon as possible, and for various reasons they wanted more than one conversation. Supportive material to help visualize complex information was suggested to be helpful, preferably with adjustable levels of detail. An empathetic, honest style with commitment of the counselor was regarded important. CONTENT: Understandable statistics should be used for those who want it. Parents needed different information with respect to the decision-making as opposed to being prepared for future situations. Decision-making: The preferred share of parents' and doctors' input in decision-making varied among parents and among situations. Parents expressed that their roles were to take responsibility for and protect their infant. CONCLUSIONS: Various parental preferences for prenatal counseling were found. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Common parental preferences for the organisation, content and decision-making elements can provide a starting point for personalized prenatal counseling.

Appraisal of a scoring instrument for training and testing neonatal intubation skills.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the validity, reliability, feasibility and applicability of a neonatal intubation scoring instrument. DESIGN: Prospective observational study. SETTING: Simulation-based research and training centre (Center for Advanced Pediatric and Perinatal Education), California, USA. SUBJECTS: Forty clinicians qualified for neonatal intubation. INTERVENTIONS: Videotaped elective intubations on a neonatal patient simulator were scored by two independent raters. One rater scored the intubations twice. We scored the preparation of equipment and premedication, intubation performance, tube position/fixation, communication, number of attempts, duration and successfulness of the procedure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for intrarater and inter-rater reliability. Kappa coefficients for individual items and mean kappa coefficients for all items combined were calculated. Construct validity was assessed with one-way analysis of variance using the hypothesis that experienced clinicians score higher than less experienced clinicians. The approximate time to score one intubation and the instrument's applicability in another setting were evaluated. RESULTS: ICCs for intrarater and inter-rater reliability were 0.99 (95% CI 0.98 to 0.99) and 0.89 (95% CI 0.35 to 0.96), and mean kappa coefficients were 0.93 (95% CI 0.85 to 1.01) and 0.71 (95% CI 0.56 to 0.92), respectively. There were no differences between the more and less experienced clinicians regarding preparation, performance, communication and total scores. The experienced group scored higher only on tube position/fixation (p=0.02). Scoring one intubation took approximately 15 min. Our instrument, developed in The Netherlands, could be readily applied in the USA. CONCLUSIONS: Our scoring instrument for simulated neonatal intubations appears to be reliable, feasible and applicable in another centre. Construct validity could not be established.

Various experiences and preferences of Dutch parents in prenatal counseling in extreme prematurity.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate experienced and preferred prenatal counseling among parents of extremely premature babies. METHODS: A Dutch nationwide, multicenter, cross-sectional study using an online survey. Surveys were sent to all parents of extremely premature babies born between 2010 and 2013 at 24+0/7-24+6/7 weeks of gestation. RESULTS: Sixty-one out of 229 surveys were returned. A minority (14%) had no counseling conversation. Conversations were done more often by neonatologists (90%) than by obstetricians (39%) and in 37% by both these experts. Supportive material was rarely used (19%). Mortality (92%) and short-term morbidity (88%) were discussed the most, and more frequently than long-term morbidity (65%), practical items (63%) and delivery mode (52%). Most decisions on active care or palliative comfort care were perceived as decisions by doctor and parents together (61%). 80% felt they were involved in decision-making. The preferred way of involvement in decision-making varied among parents. CONCLUSION: The vast majority of parents were counseled: mostly by neonatologists, and mainly about mortality and short-term morbidity. Parents wanted to be involved in the decision-making process but differed on the preferred extent of involvement. Practice implications Understanding of shared decision-making may contribute to meet the various preferences of parents.

Perspectives on periviability counselling and decision-making differed between neonatologists in the United States and the Netherlands.

AIM: American guidelines suggest that neonatal resuscitation be considered at 23 weeks of gestation, one week earlier than in the Netherlands, but how counselling practices differ at the threshold of viability is unknown. This pilot study compared prenatal periviability counselling in the two countries. METHODS: In 2013, a cross-sectional survey was sent to 121 Dutch neonatologists as part of a nationwide evaluation of prenatal counselling. In this pilot study, the same survey was sent to a convenience sample of 31 American neonatologists in 2014. The results were used to compare the organisation, content and decision-making processes in prenatal counselling at 24 weeks of gestation between the two countries. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 17 (55%) American and 77 (64%) Dutch neonatologists. American neonatologists preferred to meet with parents more frequently, for longer periods of time, and to discuss more intensive care topics, including long-term complications, than Dutch neonatologists. Neonatologists from both countries preferred shared decision-making when deciding whether to initiate intensive care. CONCLUSION: Neonatologists in the United States and the Netherlands differed in their approach to prenatal counselling at 24 weeks of gestation. Cross-cultural differences may play a role.

Professionals' preferences in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability: a nationwide qualitative Dutch study.

Prenatal counseling practices at the limits of viability do vary, and constructing a counseling framework based on guidelines, professional and parental preferences, might achieve more homogeneity. We aimed to gain insight into professionals' preferences on three domains of counseling, particularly content, organization, and decision making and their influencing factors. A qualitative, nationwide in-depth exploration among Dutch perinatal professionals by semi-structured interviews in focus groups was performed. Regarding content of prenatal counseling, preparing parents on the short-term situation (delivery room care) and revealing their perspectives on "quality of life" were considered important. Parents should be informed on the kind of decision, on the difficulty of individual outcome predictions, on survival and mortality figures, short- and long-term morbidity, and the burden of hospitalization. For organization, the making of and compliance with agreements between professionals may promote joint counseling by neonatologists and obstetricians. Supportive materials were considered useful but only when up-to-date, in addition to the discussion and with opportunity for personalization. Regarding decision making, it is not always clear to parents that a prenatal decision needs to be made and they can participate, influencing factors could be, e.g., unclear language, directive counseling, overload of information, and an immediate delivery. There is limited familiarity with shared decision making although it is the preferred model. CONCLUSION: This study gained insight into preferred content, organization, and decision making of prenatal counseling at the limits of viability and their influencing factors from a professionals' perspective. What is Known: • Heterogeneity in prenatal counseling at the limits of viability exists • Differences between preferred counseling and actual practice also exists What is New: • Insight into preferred content, organization, and decision making of prenatal periviability counseling and its influencing factors from a professionals' perspective. Results should be taken into account when performing counseling. • Particularly the understanding of true shared decision making needs to be improved. Furthermore, implementation of shared decision making in daily practice needs more attention.

Perinatal practice in extreme premature delivery: variation in Dutch physicians' preferences despite guideline.

UNLABELLED: Decisions at the limits of viability about initiating care are challenging. We aimed to investigate physicians' preferences on treatment decisions, against the background of the 2010 Dutch guideline offering active care from 24(+0/7) weeks of gestational age (GA). Obstetricians' and neonatologists' opinions were compared. An online survey was conducted amongst all perinatal professionals (n = 205) of the 10 Dutch level III perinatal care centers. Response rate was 60 % (n = 122). Comfort care was mostly recommended below 24(+0/7) weeks and intensive care over 26(+0/7) weeks. The professional views varied most at 24 and 25 weeks, with intensive care recommended but comfort care at parental request optional being the median. There was a wide range in perceived lowest limits of GA for interventions as a caesarian section and a neonatologist present at birth. Obstetricians and neonatologists disagreed on the lowest limit providing chest compressions and administering epinephrine for resuscitation. The main factors restricting active treatment were presence of congenital disorders, "small for gestational age" fetus, and incomplete course of corticosteroids. CONCLUSION: There was a wide variety in individually preferred treatment decisions, especially when aspects were not covered in the Dutch guideline on perinatal practice in extreme prematurity. Furthermore, obstetricians and neonatologists did not always agree. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Cross-cultural differences exists in the preferred treatment at the limits of viability • In the Netherlands since 2010, intensive care can be offered starting at 24 (+0/7) weeks gestation What is new: • There was a wide variety in preferred treatment decisions at the limits of viability especially when aspects were not covered in the Dutch national guideline on perinatal practice in extreme prematurity.

Practices in antenatal counseling for extremely premature infants amongst European trainees.

UNLABELLED: There is no international consensus on content and process regarding antenatal counseling in extreme prematurity. The need for adequate training is increasingly recognized. This descriptive study evaluates current practice in antenatal counseling amongst European trainees using an online survey. Focusing on the process, the majority of respondents did not have a medical consensus guideline. Seven percent of the trainees received some formal training. Focusing on the content, about half of the subjects did not mention any statistics about mortality. CONCLUSION: We observed wide variation in actual content and organization in antenatal counseling in Europe amongst European trainees in neonatology.